Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Reparation and Penance: the tools of Catholic politics

 

There is a way in which Catholics could do politics different from others. A Catholic politics would be premised on the recognition of not just the natural, but the supernatural as well. It would recognize the presence not just of time and limited lifetimes, but the existence of eternity. Finally, it would recognize the existence of God, and His saints, living in eternity, and God presiding over all time as the just judge who does, and who will, call all things to account.

Such a response is particularly necessary after the recent insults directed at St. Francis Xavier by a hired influencer. The response to these insults hurled against Goa’s patron saint have ranged from the popular – the howl of protests against the disrespect to the informal sovereign of Goa; the legal – the police complaints and the subsequent judicial process; the social – the heartwarming reassurance that St. Francis Xavier is dear to the hearts of not just Catholics in Goa, but Hindus, Muslims and others too. Surprisingly, it was a religious, a properly Catholic, response that was lacking amidst all the din.

But there is a response waiting to be articulated! First, a Catholic response will begin from the assertion that St. Francis Xavier is not dead but alive, and in heaven. In fact, it is because he is alive in heaven that we could have the miracle of his incorrupt remains in the first place. The freshness of his body, even months, years, and decades after death, was – and must be – understood as testament to the fact that Francis Xavier (as he was then) was most certainly a saint in heaven.

If he is alive, and in heaven, then it makes sense that the first response ought to have been an apology to him, and to the God whom he so faithfully served. Now, since one can hardly expect the unrepentant perpetrator of the foul language to apologize, it stands to reason that this apology should be extended by someone else.

Catholicism is rich in its response to sin and recognizes that reparation for sin can be offered by one for another. As such, when the perpetrator is unwilling to make reparation for offence given, the same reparation can be made by others on his behalf. This reparation is best done by pilgrims through a penitential pilgrimage to the space where St. Francis Xavier – the sovereign of Goa – rests.

A couple of years ago, at the time of the exposition of 2024-25, I made the acquaintance of a non-Goan, non-Christian, family that was hawking medicinal herbs and camping on the side of the road for the period. In one of our conversations, the matriarch of the family indicated that she wished to pass the New Year in Old Goa, in “the durbar of the saint.”

I was struck by the Sufi imagery she drew upon. One normally refers to the tomb, or dargah, of the Sufi holy men as their darbars. It is from this throne that they preside as Nizams, or governors, of Allah. In his important work, The Sufis of Bijapur, 1300–1700: Social Roles of Sufis in Medieval India, first published way back in 1978, the famous historian Richard Eaton pointed out that the Sultans of Bijapur claimed sovereignty over their territory, not through the exertion of military power alone, but by offering homage to various Sufi pirs. Each pir was understood to exercise sovereignty over a particular territory, and in offering service to this pir, the Sultan claimed political sovereignty over this spiritual jurisdiction. One could be struck by the similarity between this Sufi logic and that of the Portuguese Estado da India, but then, we should not be surprised; the Estado did not exist in a vacuum; it was very much a South Asian institution.

Using this lady’s imagery, it is to the Basilica of Bom Jesus, the court of Saint Francis Xavier that this penitential pilgrimage ought to travel, and reaching there prostrate before the saint to formally make apology to him for the besmirching his fair name and the staining of his honour.

This pilgrimage would consist of, and indeed be open to, not just of Catholics, but all those Goan, and non-Goan, Catholic and non-Catholic, devotees of Saint Francis who have been offended by the remarks against him. Of course, the pluralism contained in such a pluri-creedal pilgrimage would only underscore the fact that the word catholic, literally means "universal" or "all-inclusive"!

Such a pilgrimage would necessarily conclude with a Mass of reparation. The Mass, as we know, is a re-presentation of the sacrifice of Calvary, where the Son offered Himself as reparation for the sins of mankind. What we need to remember is that the offense given to St. Francis Xavier was not given to him alone, but to the God who has made him one of His holy ones and permitted St. Xavier’s body to defy the laws of nature for a time. As such, it is finally to Him that reparation must be made and apology given. The Mass is the perfect prayer, and this is what we must offer God who has so crudely been offended.

The organization of such a pilgrimage would underscore to Saint Francis Xavier, and the God whom he serves, that his people (Goan, non-Goan, Catholic, non-Catholic) continue to hold him in high regard. More importantly, they would underscore before all the sovereigns and princes of this world, that it is at his shrine alone, a place where heaven and earth meet, where this contentious matter will truly be resolved.

If Catholics, and other devotees of the saint, can understand these logics, then they would know that they are able to do Catholic politics, and not simply the politics of the secular liberalism. To engage in Catholic politics is not to displace the secular liberal State. This entity has a crucial role to play in dispensing secular justice, and it must play its role. However, the religious person knows that if the fullness of justice is to be realized, the justice of the world must also be supplemented by divine justice. It is to this end that Catholic politics is eventually directed, supplementing the natural, with the supernatural to give completeness to our actions.

There are many in Goa, Catholic and non-Catholic, who are concerned that the uniqueness of our territory, where all lived in harmony, and more importantly love, is under threat. We must bear in mind that this bonhomie is the result of the blessings of St. Francis Xavier, and we need to turn to him, for in this time of assault, he is our sure defense.

St. Francis Xavier, pray for us!

(A version of this text was first published in the O Heraldo on 13 May 2026.)

(Image reference: "The Corpus Christi Procession" Arcadi Mas i Fondevila, 1887, Museu Maricel de Sitges.)

 


Sunday, May 10, 2026

Come Holy Spirit! Homily for the Sixth Sunday of Easter

My dear brothers and sisters, today the lectionary offers us an opportunity to reflect on the sacraments of Christian initiation, which including the Eucharist, begins with baptism, and ends with confirmation. In the first reading today, we read that:

They [the people of Samaria] had only been baptized [by Philip] in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Then they [Peter and John] laid hands on them
and they received the Holy Spirit.

In these words from the Acts of the Apostles we see that the people of Samaria accepted baptism, and became Christian, but they did not receive the gift of the Holy Spirit until hands were laid upon them by the apostles Peter and John.

Why was this?

Saint Bede explains to us that the Philip whom we read about in the Acts is most probably not Philip the Apostle, but Philip the deacon, the narrative of whose selection and ordination we encountered in the first reading last Sunday. St. Bede reasons that had it been Philip the apostle who baptized Samaria, then the Holy Spirit would have flowed immediately. But because the power to communicate the gift of the Holy Spirit is “reserved only to those of pontifical rank,” therefore, it required the presence of the apostles Peter and John for Samaria’s entry into the faith to come to conclusion.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches us that in case of a necessity, anyone can baptize a person into the Christian faith. But it is only a bishop, priest, or a deacon – like Philip – who can ordinarily baptize a person (CCC 1256). Further, it is only the Bishop, a successor of the apostles, who can confirm Christians in the faith. As the Catechism (CCC 1292) teaches us, the anointing by the Bishop:

expresses the communion of the new Christian with the bishop as guarantor and servant of the unity, catholicity and apostolicity of his Church, and hence the connection with the apostolic origins of Christ's Church.

This incident from the Acts of the Apostles illustrates perfectly what the Church teaches us about the sacraments of Christian initiation:

the reception of the sacrament of Confirmation is necessary for the completion of baptismal grace. For "by the sacrament of Confirmation, [the baptized] are more perfectly bound to the Church and are enriched with a special strength of the Holy Spirit.

We hear that at the time of confirmation, we receive the seal of the Holy Spirit, but what does this mean? The seal is like a brand. The process of branding involves the heating up of a metal design, that is then pressed onto flesh, so that the flesh, or skin, is permanently scarred and becomes an indelible sign. While today we only brand animals, to indicate to whom they belong, in the past the brand was imposed on slaves and on soldiers indicating that they belonged to a particular Master.

The symbology of branding illustrates wonderfully the process, and the result, of what takes place at confirmation. The Holy Spirit, which revealed itself at Pentecost in tongues of flame, is the fire that is pressed on our flesh, through the oil of chrism. This Holy Spirit burns our spiritual flesh, to demonstrate – primarily to the invisible world – that this individual now belongs, fully, and completely, to the Church of God, founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ. In other words, it is made crystal clear that we are servants of Our Lord, and our servitude is to Him alone, and no one else.

In the old days, the mark of one’s Master or Lord offered one certain privileges. If we belonged to a powerful Master, we lived in his shadow of his umbrella and no one would dare to mess with us, for fear of invoking the anger of the Master. With confirmation, we are supported by the graces of the Holy Spirit, able to fight off the temptations of the demonic world that surrounds us and seeks to distract us from the pursuit of our true home in heaven.

But, as in the old days, branding does not involve only benefits, but also obligations. We are obliged to serve our master. Similarly, with confirmation. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church (§ 1285) teaches us:

as true witnesses of Christ, [we are] more strictly obliged to spread and defend the faith by word and deed.

And;

it gives us a special strength of the Holy Spirit to … never to be ashamed of the Cross (CCC 1303)

This is question we must ask ourselves, therefore, dear brothers and sisters; how much do we do to fulfill this obligation to spread and defend the faith by word and deed?

(A version of this homily was first preached in Concanim to the faithful at the Cathedral parish of St. Catherine of Alexandria, Old Goa on 10 May 10, 2026.)

(Image reference: The Apostles Peter and John Blessing the People of Samaria, Giorgio Vasari, 1557, Gemäldegalerie, Berlin.)