The writings of the great Roman
savant Pliny the Elder in Naturalis
Historia present to us an interesting episode from the history of art. In
this anecdote Pliny recounts a contest between the two great Greek artists,
Zeuxis and Parrhasius. Keen to settle which of them was the greatest artist of
the time the two agreed on producing an image that was most realistic. For his
part Zeuxis painted an image of fruits that is reported to have been so life
like that it deceived the birds that came to peck at it. Parrhasius then
invited Zeuxis to view the former’s painting that was hidden behind a curtain.
Zeuxis attempted to pull back the curtain only to realize that it was in fact
the curtains that constituted Parrhasius’ image. While Zeuxis may have possibly
felt like a fool, Pliny recounts that Zeuxis is supposed to have been gracious
in defeat acknowledging Parrhasius as the winner with the acclamation: “I have
deceived the birds, but Parrhasius has deceived Zeuxis.”
This desire, and the capacity, to
fool the eye and imitate reality so completely was not restricted merely to
these two great Greeks but has persisted down into our time. In the Baroque
period this skill was acclaimed by the French term Trompe-l'œil, which means “to fool the eye”. This skill was put to
use not only to imitate objects, but to transcend space through painting
architectural and natural details on walls and make it appear as the wall had
given way to the scene painted on the wall. Churches in the Baroque period
would, for example, use the knowledge of perspective to depict domes where in
fact only a flat ceiling existed, or better still, depict the heavenly hosts
bursting through the ceiling.
One does not need visits to
Europe to encounter trompe-l'œil. The
technique is present in two of Charles Correia’s creations in Goa; the Kala
Academy, and the Cidade de Goa hotel complex. I imagine that Correia’s design
provided hundreds of children, and perhaps adults, hours of delightful fantasy
as they contemplated the world on the other side of the walls of his buildings.
This was their effect on my own childhood.
More recently I had fun
encounters with trompe-l'œil, at the
Museu Serralves in the city of Porto, Portugal. Conceived of in 1989 by the Serralves
Foundation as a space to host a collection of contemporary art, the museum
building project was commissioned to the internationally renowned Portuguese
architect Álvaro Siza Vieira, and the building completed in 1999. In his
brief, Siza was invited to design a museum building that took into
consideration the specific characteristics of the physical setting and the need
for integration within the surrounding landscape. Siza fulfilled his task with
aplomb given that the museum sits discreetly, an obstrusive presence in its
natural settings. It is, however, as one moves through the fourteen galleries
that constitute this museum that one realizes the extent to which Siza took his
brief seriously.
Perhaps playing with the tradition
of trompe-l'œil, in these galleries
Siza has included huge windows that allow for the outside to enter into the
building. Given that the museum sits within a marvelously landscaped garden,
all too often the vistas that these windows look out onto are stunning. In
addition to gazing on art works that are hung on the walls, one can also look
out on to the artfully landscaped outside. However, thanks to the insulation of
the building one is bereft of the sounds from the outside, one is never quite
sure if one is on the inside looking out, or merely looking at another art work that bends our sense
of space. In an era where one is often confronted with video installations that
may or may not include sound, my sensation when walking through the galleries
was like being confronted with the kind of vistas television companies utlise
when selling their gigantic television screens. Whether Siza intended it, or
not, the visitor to the Museu Serralves is definitely once again in the playing
fields of trompe-l'œil.
But there was another way in
which the ghosts of Zeuxis and Parrhasius haunted me at Serralves. Walking away
with delight from another gorgeous vista that Siza had opened up, I came upon a
wall that seemed to hold a fine metal mesh. To my embarrassment, however, I
realized that it was not a mesh at all. Rather, it was lead pencil drawings on
a wall, the artist Sol Lewitt’s creation titled Wall Drawing #133 (Arcs from Four Corners). Wall drawing # 133 is in fact a mobile and variable art work,
capable of repetition in any part of the world as long as it follows the
artist’s instructions.
“The draughtsman
in charge of Wall Drawing #133 (Arcs from
Four Corners) must draw arcs at five-centimetre intervals, coming from the
four corners of the wall. Large or small, horizontal or vertical, rectangular
or square, the wall must be used fully and the resulting work varies according
to those variables.”
While still in raptures over my encounter, I peeked into the alcove next to Wall Drawing, and found
a fire extinguishing assemblage located in the centre of a wall. Given
that I was in the section of the Sonnabender Collection devoted to
minimalism, I contemplated the assemblage a while longer, until I
realised with some blushing awkwardness that it was no art installation,
but exactly what it appeared to be, basic life, and property, saving
infrastructure in the great museum. Somewhere up above, I could hear the
artists chuckle at my predicament in the halls of the immortals.
(A version of this post was first published in The Goan on 13 March 2016)
No comments:
Post a Comment