Not unlike the Muslim communities
in India, Christians in the country are also victim to a persistent questioning
of their patriotism. While this suspicion of Christian groups has been a fact
since the formation of the Indian state in 1947, this issue has gained in
dimension with the election to power of the Modi government which has not only
emboldened Hindu nationalist groups to dismiss all actions and ideas that fail
to conform to the aims of Hindu nationalist groups as unpatriotic but has in
fact led to increasing anti-Catholic violence perpetrated by these groups in
various parts of India, but especially in Central India. It seems that this
crisis facing Christians in India was very much on the mind of Cardinal Oswald
Gracias when speaking at the conference of Latin rite bishops held in Bangalore
in February this year, he reportedly
said, “The Catholic Church needs our nation, and India needs the Church. We
will be discussing our role as Indian Christians and asking our people, [sic] also
to become better Indian Christians. This is the call of today to be fully
Indian fully Christian”.
While appreciative of the
delicate position that the Catholic hierarchy in India finds itself in, the Cardinal’s
position will only drag us in deeper into the mess that contemporary India is
devolving into. In making statements such as that of the Cardinal, the bishops
are making a profound analytical mistake, not dissimilar to that made by the
European Jews from the mid-eighteenth century onwards. Assuming that it was
their external difference from Christian Europeans that was the reason for
anti-semitic hostility, sections of the Jews began to give up their distinctive
dress, customs, and sometimes religion, to try and fit, or assimilate,
into the mainstream. As the tragic consequences of the World War II
demonstrate, this did not stop them from being demonized across Europe, and
eventually meeting their end largely through the efforts of Nazi Germany. A
similar mistake by the Catholic leadership in India could have serious
consequences for Christians across the country.
The call to “be fully Indian
fully Christian” offers two suggestions. First, that Indian Christians are not
as yet fully Indian, and secondly, that it is possible to identify what it
means to be fully Indian, and then meet those goals. The first suggestion in
fact plays directly into the hands of Hindu nationalists of all shades, who
suggest either explicitly or subtly that, given Christianity’s foreign origins,
Christians in India are not authentically Indian. That this claim is recognized
by Christians themselves can be seen in a variety of cultural interventions
that purport to be forms of inculturation. In this context it is worth bearing
in mind that the attempt to become
"Hindu-Christian" by some theologians, is in fact identical to
the requirement that the RSS places on all Muslims and Christians in India -
that they be Hindu-Muslims and Hindu-Christians, positing Hinduism (understood
exclusively in its upper-caste brahmanical forms) as the base culture of India.
It is the second suggestion that
requires more work to deal with. The recommendation that Catholics in India
should be more Indian and more Christian, seems to suggest that Indian-ness is
capable of being objectively determined. This is not a sound appreciation of
reality. There is a mountain of scientific research that points to the fact
that the unspoken ideal subject of Indian nationalism is the upper-caste
(North) Indian Hindu male. Such research points out how even Jawaharlal Nehru’s
writings demonstrate an unconscious bias of Hindu-ness as the underlying theme
of Indian-ness. It is these men,
regardless of whether they are Hindu nationalists, or secular Hindus, who
define, and have been defining, what Indian-ness means. Bluntly put, given that
Christians in India are not in the position of defining what Indian-ness means,
there is simply no way in which we will ever be able to approximate the ideals
of Indian-ness set by Indian nationalists of any hue.
What killed the Jews of Europe is
similar to what threatens all non-Hindu communities in India today, the growth
of nationalism. The problem with most popular analyses of nationalism is that they
do not recognize the difference between the concepts of the nation, and the
state. These are two distinct concepts that have been clubbed together. The
distinction between the two is perhaps best captured in Hannah Arendt’s pithy
observation of “the conquest of the state by the nation”. In her perspective nationalism transformed the
modern state, from an organ which would execute the rule of law for all its
citizens and residents, into the nation-state, an instrument of the nation
alone. Modern nationalism is inherently a divisive force, identifying religion,
ethnicity, or language as the basis of the nation, and in this process
inevitably excluding groups within the state, or creating hatred of those
without. In this context it is worth noting that social groups do not naturally
exist as minorities; they are actively
created, or minoritized through
conscious exclusion. That this exclusion is an inevitable aspect of nationalism
is made obvious in the fact that the only way secular liberal nationalisms
across the world can think of the relationship with minority groups is that of
“tolerance”. Not love, but tolerance.
In many ways, nationalism is a theology,
which articulates a mystical relationship between the national-citizen and the
nation constructed as deity. It is when we recognize the theological nature of
modern nationalism, and the nation-state that perhaps we will become aware that
there cannot be a compromise between nationalism and the Christian calling. In
this context, Archbishop Macwan was right in the phrasing of the
pastoral letter for which he was pilloried. Catholics have a religious
obligation to ensure that nationalists do not take over the state.
Fortunately Catholics in India are not called to make a dramatic choice. The Christian call to universalism, one that recognizes neither Jew nor Gentile (Gal 3:28), can ensure that Christians are more than able to participate to the benefit of the state, but refuse to cooperate in the sectarian projects of contemporary nationalism. There is of course no need for Catholic leadership in India to actively proclaim a refusal to participate in nationalist projects, this would be a fool-hardy venture in the current climate. But there is similarly no need for us to contribute to nationalist rhetoric by asking that we become “more Indian”. Our call is to be more Christian, loving all without distinction.
(A version of this post was first published on UCA News on 13 Apr 2018)
No comments:
Post a Comment